Tight Lacing In The (Pre-) Victorian And Edwardian Era

Tight Lacing In The (Pre-) Victorian And Edwardian Era

‘There was one blushing damsel, just budding sixteen, whose waist by a corset ne’er encircled had been, but whose mother insisted that on such a night one should find a place there, and the lacing be tight.’ (How She Felt In Her First Corset, 1887)

Tight lacing often was frowned upon in the Victorian and Edwardian era. I’ve compiled articles from 1800 till the 1920s which regard tight lacing as a danger to health. They say that tight lacing would produce diseases from cancer to consumption (tuberculosis) to abortion and even death.


Willich (1802) regards corsets as important  for the health and comfort of women. However, stays shouldn’t be heavily boned, they should be rather made from wool felt or chamois leather. According to him, tight lacing causes cancer, nausea, distortion of the spine, and many other diseases. Willich recommends stays boned with nearly parallel whalebone strips and fastened at the sides with hooks and eyes. This corset should be made short so as to not to ‘produce any inconvenience on sitting down’. These stays may also be padded and stuffed as much as one wishes. – I’m wondering in what way this boned and padded corset should be better than other boned corsets. 😉 What do you think?

In 1836, Alcott says that tight lacing injures the lungs. Woman, and especially children, should never wear a corset. No busk or rigid seams should impede the movement of the ribs while breathing. The spine doesn’t need artificial support ‘to keep the body errect’. Alcott continues that tight lacing promotes shortness of breath, an unhealthy complexion, chronic diseases, and weakened organs.

There’s a cynical saying in 1846 that ‘tight lacing is a public benefit; for it kills off the foolish girls, and leaves the wise ones for good wives and mothers’ (Munn et al., 1846).

‘Above all, as you regard health, comfort, and beauty, do not lace too tightly. A waist too small for the natural proportion of the figure is the worst possible deformity, and produces many others. No woman who laces tight can have good shoulders, a straight spine, good lungs, sweet breath, or is fit to be a wife and mother.’ (Philip, 1856) Here’s a picture of an 1875-85 corded side lacing sports corset.

Tight lacing shall even produce death ‘by cramping the motion of the heart’ (Johnson et al., 1909). She continues that the wasp-like shape is ‘unlovely’ and ‘unnatural’. The ‘outdoor girl’ ‘cannot have her movements impeded by long skirts, tight corsets, or a gigantic hat.’ (Every Woman’s Encyclopaedia, 1910-2a) An ‘all-in-one type of dress can be worn without corsets’. However, this source regards the modern corset as quite ‘hygienic’, not comparable to the stiff, old-fashioned stays. It is pliable, keeps the body warm, and gives support. To be healthy and keep young, a woman should wear a corset ‘made for her, and pay as good a price as she can afford.’ If a good corset is too expensive, she should choose light ones, such as ribbon corsets, and do daily exercises. Furthermore, a woman shouldn’t be ashamed of her pregnancy and therefore lace too tightly (Alsaker, 1916). If it is necessary at all, a light corset should be worn with shoulder straps. Here’s a picture of an 1890s corded health corset with shoulder straps.

Every Woman’s Encyclopaedia (1910-2b) calls the seventeenth century an era of extreme tight lacing, but today the figure is kept trim to old age with exercise, diet, and a good, but moderate, corset. Here’s an 1893 ad for a Good Sense Corset Waist. A girl should only wear a corded bodice till she’s fifteen. Between sixteen and seventeen, the figure should be gradually shaped so that there are no attempts at tight lacing in later age. Every Woman’s Encyclopaedia condemns the wearing of indiarubber belts in Turkish baths for weight reduction, and punishment corsets in schools. If some sleeping corset must be worn, it should just be of woolen stockinette.

Even in 1922, Lindlahr says that a woman who wears a tight laced corset plants ‘the seeds of cancer in the child’.

And today, it’s said that underwire bras cause breast cancer which is just a myth (Gorski, 2014; American Cancer Society, 2014).


On the other hand, well fitting corsets are thought health-promoting. Corsets are now ‘”therapeutic agents” recommended by many physicians.’ A tight laced corset isn’t bad as long as there’s no ‘nip in’ in the waist with a ‘downward pressure on the intestines’. A long, stout corset – not made from net – protects from chills and abdominal diseases in the tropics. Furthermore, corsets shall increase ‘a woman’s brain power’ because they bring stagnant blood near the intestines to the brain (Every Woman’s Encyclopaedia, 1910-2c). However the same source continues that ‘it is not necessary, in order to attain a fashionable figure, to be ” drawn in ” by staylaces until you cannot bend and can hardly breathe, for at length we recognise that beauty of outline is not gained by strenuous pinching-in of the middle of one’s figure.’ There’s a decreasing demand for small corset sizes: ‘Extreme tight-lacing is, luckily, no longer fashionable.’


Lacing a corset too tightly – especially in childhood – is surely bad for the health. Apart from that, I think there were promoted some myths as truth. On the one hand, because they knew less about causes of disease than today. On the other hand, they wanted to sell their product, such as ‘health corsets’.



One thought on “Tight Lacing In The (Pre-) Victorian And Edwardian Era

  1. Hello

    Lovely post, thank you.

    I’ve just started a new blog on “why a corset”. It’s non commercial and I want to explore why women have (and still are) wearing corsets. It’s at


    All comments and input is welcomed!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *